We all know about the underlying principles of troll science (trolology). But, I may have discovered a beautiful formula relating the troll coefficient to the relative intelligence of a troll. This could prove to be a fundamental theory.
Troll coefficient = T(i) = i x [1/(Δt^2)]
i = intellectual quotient of target
Δt = change in time
This shows the rate of controversy increase (or ΔT). It is based on the common fact that intelligence decrease due to a post causes controversy and thus a rate of controversy change.
The intelligence of a troll (or ί) is denoted by a quotient:
L/t
L= Length of post
t = Time (duh)
Longer posts are more confusing so somebody who writes a long blog but can highlight key points (to start controversy) is intelligent.
My formula is then as follows:
T(i) + T(i^1/2) + T(i^1/3) ... =
Log C + Σ {ί^n} ζ {T(i)}
C = a constant
Unfortunately, I do not know the value of 'C'. But, if I (or you) could find the value of C, you would prove my beautiful formula.
The value of 'n' increases by 1 at each step of the summation and starts at one..
Also, ζ(T[i]) = Σ T(i)^-n
Until a value of C is found, this remains hypothetical. The Logarithm is to base 'e' and not '10'.
If my hypothesis is correct, we know how to determine how the intelligence of a troll effects the troll coefficient. Or indeed vice-versa. It would also show how the troll coefficient shows no rate of change. In fact, we may even be able to create an accurate troll model by using troll integral calculus.
If pointless blogs weren't worth featuring then I wouldn't have a single featured blog. Now I'm off to go write another. I think I'll make it about dragons. =D