The amount is fine the way it
If there are going to be any new ChatMins, it should be limited to 2 or 3 new ones.
The distinguished Skittles spake:If there are going to be any new ChatMins, it should be limited to 2 or 3 new ones.
You're just trying to be one. It's obvious. I've read some of your posts and you dont seem like the kind of person who woud be a mod.
The distinguished Omnibender spake:[quote]The distinguished Skittles spake:If there are going to be any new ChatMins, it should be limited to 2 or 3 new ones.
<br>
<br>You're just trying to be one. It's obvious. I've read some of your posts and you dont seem like the kind of person who woud be a mod.
The distinguished PrincessChanny spake:[quote]Well,l think both because some admin's are 'Know it all!' but some are kind,l could list the know it all admin's such as Takis Teh Greek his harsh to people!Even if they begged admin so what!Atleast they are happy.
The distinguished LinkZelda spake:I think we should approach this scientifically.So on here, too many people are banned so nobody breaks the rules, thus meaning that chatmins aren't necessary!
Think about rabbit and fox populations. More rabbits mean more foxes which means less rabbits. This in turn, means less foxes and more rabbits can reproduce. In other words, we'll never have enough admins because the SDK population is exponentially growing.
If we have more foxes than there should be, the rabbit population will graduately decrease, until it reaches zero. If it reaches zero, both rabbits and foxes will die (rabbits from many foxes, foxes cause of lack of food).
The distinguished Moulder spake:[quote]Not to be boasting my self, but I'd be a good blog moderator because I am always reading every ones blogs. But I'm not here for that.