It's one thing when you fail at grammar and spelling, but, when you write one word and mean a completely different word, you're not even trying... Given that I cannot understand what you wrote due to its incoherence and terrible grammar, I shall assume you are supporting the 3DS entirely... Because the PS Vita is a failure as a mobile gaming device. You would be foolish to even consider the possibility of it being better. I think someone mentioned that you could play older games on the PS Vita. If that is true, then good for the Vita, but the 3DS probably still maintains a greater game library, thanks to its backwards compatibility with DS and DSi games and, also, its eShop (which provides both eShop games and DSiWare games).
A. You don't have to be a jackass over an opinion.
B. Many of your arguments are stupidly subjective
C... And the remainder are just plain insults.
I don't even own a Vita, but that was a crappy argument
The distinguished Tribut3 spake:[quote]Dayummmmm..Now that was like a boss,You made alot of sence there.[/quote]...
A. I wasn't being a jackass over an opinion; I was being a jackass over terrible grammar. Grammar exists to help make communication as clear and understandable as possible; otherwise, the meaning is left to interpretation.
B. How stupidly subjective my arguments may be is, in itself, subjective. Your argument is invalid, but I'll try to play along, based on an assumption of the definition of subjective. Though I may "slightly" exaggerate the dominance of the Nintendo 3DS over the PS Vita, the fact remains that the 3DS has a larger video game library. Less relevant (though still relevant) is the fact that Nintendo has essentially controlled the mobile video gaming market since they entered (based on many, many numbers), and the PS Vita poses no threat (subjective).
C. "And the remainder..."? The first half insults his grammar, and the second half states my opinion... Both were already addressed, I believe...
P.S. Your arguments are no less "crappy" and "stupidly subjective" than mine.
It is indeed my opinion that it would be foolish to prefer the PS Vita over the 3DS. Despite how "aggressive" the word "foolish" may seem to you (I don't think you know the actual meaning of the word), you are no better than myself; you directly referred to me as a "jackass" and called my arguments "crappy". Furthermore, by bashing my arguments within the context (Thread "PS Vita or 3DS"), it was implied that you were "pro-PS Vita". Finally, every sentence from that post was subjective and argumentative. You have been hypocritical, self-righteous, and debatably hostile. You were unclear in your meaning and rude in your method, and we are done here.
A. " You would be foolish to even consider the possibility of it being better." And you can simply state "fix your grammar"
B. Nowhere do I state "zomg 3ds pwns and any1 who sez vita is better is teh suck". Nowhere do I even make an argument as a matter of fact, tell me one subjective sentence in that post. I didn't support the 3DS nor the Vita.
C. Basically yeah, we just went over this.
@P.S. Except I had no arguments in that post, like I said. And if I did I wouldn't directly state "Your opinion is foolish"
Remainder of B: For the record, I own a 3DS and not a Vita. It actually is basically objective that the Vita stands no chance over the 3DS, and that the game library is larger. That doesn't mean someone is a moron for preferring the Vita.
A. Please don't quote two long posts to respond with one short sentence.Evidence of you being hypocritical, I believe, as well as rude. Not to mention, the reference to me counts as agitation or "trolling", as it seems to be known as on the internet.
B. It made perfect sense. At least use valid arguments (which tribut3 did as subjective as they were) instead of spewing crap.
Dumbass ↑ >.>
@Tribut3: A. I said you don't have to be a jackass, you said "you would be foolish". Context is still key. [Hmm... You still called me jackass for stating my own opinion; I simply stated that it is my personal belief that it would be unwise, as is the definition of foolish, to prefer the PS Vita over the 3DS. This was addressed.]I'm tired of writing full length paragraphs, as you are no longer worth the time. Face facts: all you did was hostilely attack everything that I had written, and now your pathetically trying to justify what you typed with petty arguments that, ultimately, mean nothing.
B. No, not a single argument was subjective, other then "crappy argument" which was separated. Again, use your own tips and look up definitions. [I never called upon any arguments; I merely stated that everything that you had written was argumentative, given the context, as well as subjective. I never referred to what you typed as "arguments" in my previous post.]
C. I said I don't own a Vita. Your inference holds absolutely no standing if you miss a complete sentence. [Whether or not you own either console does not determine which one you prefer; therefore, your argument is invalid.]
2A. Please point to the hypocritical argument. I can say MJ King argued his point, while all monstaboy did was say one erroneous sentence.
And I don't really care if you like long reply chains, it's wasting page space. [Rude.]
The distinguished MONSTABOY spake:[quote]Dumbass ↑ >.>