My thoughts on Trumps's assassination attempt. By noobishpro

Welcome, Guest.

By noobishpro
POSTED: 18 Jul 2024 03:10
CATEGORY: Polemic Rant
FEATURED: No (Divine Crusader)
(Go to comments)

So most of you know about the assassination attempt on former president Trump's life. So here are my thought's on what had happened on that day and why the sniper was not spotted before hand.

Now one of the reason's the sniper missed I think is because he was spotted on the building and SS (Secret Service) agent's had spotted him. So because the SS spotted him he had to hurry up and take the shot.

So with that being said I would like to also point out the fact that he was only 150 yard's away from were the president was speaking. So that means that the SS perimeter was either breached, or the perimeter was less than 150 yard's. But even if the perimeter was less then 150 yard's how did the SS sniper's not see him there were 6 SS snipers's there and the enemy was in plain sight, and why did the SS not respond to the shout's of the people saying "HE'S GOT A GUN HE'S GOT A GUN" until he started firing.

Now I think that if he would have made the shot that he would have lived because I think it was an inside job, or they would have killed him anyway because well "dead man can't talk".

But whatever the case may be I am just glad Trump is okay and i also think that God has a hand on Trump.

Stay safe out there

+2 -0

Draconid_Jo
18 Jul 2024 15:12

TBH, I agree that it was an inside job, but my personal opinion is that Trump himself is behind it (which is why he wasn't killed), as this will inevitably boost his credibility by creating the perception that “they” are willing to do anything to stop him from becoming president, even resorting to murder.
(Similar to how I believe that Trump's enemies were actually the ones behind Jan 6th, and did it just to make Trump look bad.)

As for why this was rejected, this sort of content is obviously controversial (and therefore unlikely to be featured), and if you're going to make these sorts of claims (even if they're true), you would have to provide a far more detailed analysis of the incident than this, similar to what @MrPwong did in this blog about a war crime committed by US soldiers in Iraq.

noobishpro
18 Jul 2024 15:38
In reply to Draconid_Jo

wait but would the grammar and everything like that have been acceptable?

Draconid_Jo
18 Jul 2024 15:58
In reply to noobishpro

The grammar might not be perfect, but the fact that I didn't notice it while reading it means that (more than likely) it wouldn't be an issue with regard to featuring it, and this is more about the level of detail that you go into in the blog.

Another key point of a featured blog is details. What is the point of the blog? What message are you trying to tell us? Don't skimp out of details. Be very descriptive of your details. Tell us everything you know about the subject you're telling us.

Source

This is especially true of blogs making controversial or contentious claims such as this one (or my religiously based pro-LGBTQIA+ blog), as most people will (rightly or wrongly) want to brand these sorts of ideas as “conspiracy theories”, and like any other “theories”, you'd better provide a lot of evidence if you are going to be claiming that it is true.

noobishpro
18 Jul 2024 16:05
In reply to Draconid_Jo

okay thx

Draconid_Jo
18 Jul 2024 16:08
In reply to noobishpro

YW.

noobishpro
18 Jul 2024 15:29
In reply to Draconid_Jo

so ill never get it featured

Draconid_Jo
18 Jul 2024 15:32
In reply to noobishpro

Not unless you write a MrPwong quality blog about this.
(Sorry.)

noobishpro
18 Jul 2024 15:34
In reply to Draconid_Jo

okay thx anyway im glad that i know

noobishpro
18 Jul 2024 15:28
In reply to Draconid_Jo

wow i can't belive that i did perfect grammar

My thoughts on Trumps's assassination attempt.

Comments