I could understand Pokemon versus games like Yu-Gi-Oh, Digimon, Spectrobes, or Monster Rancher. But with Call of Duty, it doesn't make much sense. Unless you're trying to make this a discussion about popularity, or even overrated series, in which case you would question so--on the Gaming board.
alright. lets try not to fight here. who cares if someone thinks pokemon is better and the other likes black ops. what i believe is pokemon is for little kids. black ops is for the older teenagers. now pokemon can be for teenagers. lets not fight. alright?
Wow... What kind of no- I mean, person, could thinj they an compare to different games, of different origin? 1st, if it was comparing RPGs Vs. FPS', then fine--GAMING BOARD. Pokèmon Vs. Radiant Historia[remind me to get that this week], FINE--GAMING BOARD.
CoD is nothing more than glorifying war. Or, as a certain deceased author put it, "The world's 2nd failed attempt to commit suicide."[BONUS POINTS IF YOU SAY HIS NAME. OFTO]
Anyway, it's basically comparing Apples to Bananas.
Oh, and, as a card game & Animè, Yu-Gi-Oh[Duelist Kingdom through Duel City, that is,] wns. As a video game, only ne good game, and that's a GBC game.[Excellent if paired w/ a GBA Player].
I choose Pokèmon. If I want action, I'll pop in Melee.
Whoa bro, better slow down bro, don't wanna be a bro, bro.
Well, that raises a good point, makes me feel better that some suburbanite kid who doesn't know what Public Transportation is is living the "American Dream". But I digress.
My point is, they don't think of any new ideas, just how to make "awshum, kik-@$$" graphics.
Whoa bro, better slow down bro, don't wanna be a bro, bro.