Comments for SkaterGirl13

bradleybrown1198
02 May 2013 04:08

thats an example from a game, but it essentialy is the same thing, although fiction, as irl aposing beleifs.

bradleybrown1198
02 May 2013 04:07

Truth is different than good vs bad. However nobody fo sure knows truth so you wouldnt know who is right. how can anything at all say there is a right or wrong? nobody could really know. good vs evil is purely pespective based. Howver, if a god exists, and a single viewpoint if not nuetral from that god, like in christianity, thete are those who side with god and those who dont. even then, come to think of it, i think there cant be a solid good vs evil. good would be a side. evil would be a side. as an example, in the collectable card game, magic: the gathering, in the plane of ravnica there are five guilds that each have theirr own values. the guild radkos is a cult that worships a demon and beleives in caos and wild unruly freedom. on the other hand, the guild boros enforces laws and stuff. if you were a fictional rakdos cultist you woud beleive that rules are bad and caos and killing is more fun. many would label that evil. if you were a fictional boros soldier, you wuld probably think that is unsafe and dangerous and stop the rakdos cultists. two different bleif sets, but in reality, they are opinions. One guild thinks freedom with caos is better while another thinks law and restrictions with safety is better. neither are right or wrong. just different.

bradleybrown1198
02 May 2013 02:47

You do raise a valid point, but I also think there is o right or wrong way to liv ones life. I don't beleive i the concept of good or evil, right or wrong. I think you should live life how you think you should because nobody can know whats right. On one side one person might beleive one things right while the other is wrong, but on the opposite side, there may be the opposite. Therefore right and wrong is based on perspective, and is a flawed concept. I would only encourage someone to prove me wrong, because I don't know anything for sure either, but that is how I see it. What if it turns out truth is flipped from the bible and you did the opposite of whats right. You may never know. I think thatregardless of what you do your chancs of being right are the same. If I am right about everything having an equal chance of being right. I would love to be proven wrong on anyhing because then I only absorb more tasty knoledge, so if you ever have even an idea that goes against mine, please share it. Just provide evidnce. Then again, nothing any of us say can be 100% proven, so in reality, being human and trying to figure out how stuff works is impossable if not near impossable. The human brain can only comprehend so much.

bradleybrown1198
02 May 2013 01:24

Sorry for all the typos, also it is nice to have an intelligent, unbiased descussion with something who has different views than you. We are sharing ideas rather than claiming that I am wrong or you are wrong.

bradleybrown1198
02 May 2013 01:20

About being perminantly unconciouse upon death, I have reasons for this. When you die your brain and stuff isn't working any more to my knoledge. Your brain operates your senses, therefor without your senses you would be unconcious (as far as I know) snd so it would make sense for the lack of being conciouse to be perminant. Say you were reanimated or something crazy and probably impossible, wouldn't your brain be rotted and have to be replaced, and then you would have new memories and stuff and be a brand new person. As for heaven, that depends on wether you beleive in souls and how. Some could think your memories and souldbecome a ghost entity, others think it goes to god. I think that with some evidence, your memories stay with your dead brain, and the only thing I think has a chnace of being equivilant to life after death is the concept of sould. Do to me not having a clue about how your soul would "work", I will leave the idea of a soul up for i terpritation. The reason I am no longer Christian is because I always questioned things, and eventually decided thatscience is the closest thing we have to proof. I don't think science is 100% correct but I think if anything is it is close. But a Christian also has reason to beleive the Bible do to the possibility of it being more or less a documentation of god.

Waffle King
01 May 2013 21:31

I gueessssss.

Waffle King
01 May 2013 21:06

I'm Batman.

bradleybrown1198
01 May 2013 04:19

I think you could be right or wrong. I think anything and everything has an offchance of being true. As humans it is aparently impossible to establish a 100% factual truth. We can only ask ourselves things as I have been pondering the same questions fpr years. I think all religions as well as science is all just theories, some with more or less or different evidence. I personally feel that it seems highly probable based on evidence, that when we die, we just go perminantly unconcious and our bodies rot. Our memories are possibly stored in some form of atoms or energy or, as sugguested in a book I once read, stored in water. I could be wrong or right. Theres no way I can actually be for sure. Even if I could experience death and tell you, theres also a possibility it wasn't death and I don't know that. I think the same applies to everything because humans don't seem to be able to comprehend 100% truth. Do you see what I mean? Not saying you have to agree.

bradleybrown1198
01 May 2013 03:16

I also apreciate that your a christian who didn't freak out because I disagree with Christian beleifs. Some people would be like "Your gona go to hell!" as if they are even of high enough power to even decide that.

bradleybrown1198
01 May 2013 02:56

I should probably inform you tht I am athiest, former Christain. As common as it is for athiests to bash Christianity, religion fascinates me and I do like to learn about it, but I look at it from a competly unbiasef standpoint.